Knowledge HubApplication Notes

IGBT Desat Protection — Why Current Sensor Response Time Matters

When an IGBT short-circuits, you have less than 10 microseconds to turn it off before catastrophic failure. Current sensor response time eats up most of that budget. Here is the math.

2026-04-256 min read
IGBT Desat Protection — Why Current Sensor Response Time Matters

The 10-microsecond window

A standard IGBT in short-circuit mode (SCM) heats up rapidly through resistive losses. The IGBT manufacturer's data sheet specifies a Short Circuit Withstand Time (SCWT) of typically 10 µs at rated voltage. Beyond that, the device fails.

Within that 10 µs window, the entire fault detection and shut-off chain must execute:

StepTypical time budget
1. Current rises to detection threshold1-2 µs
2. Sensor detects + reports< 1 µs
3. Comparator triggers200 ns
4. Gate driver desat circuit reacts1-2 µs
5. Soft turn-off begins1 µs
6. IGBT current drops to safe level2-3 µs
Total≈ 7-10 µs

There is zero margin. The current sensor's response time is one of the largest budget items.

What "response time" actually means

A current sensor's response time has three components:

  1. Magnetic flux propagation through the core — typically 100-500 ns
  2. Hall element settling — 100-500 ns
  3. Output amplifier slew — 100-500 ns

A sensor specified at "<1 µs response time (10-90 %)" means the output reaches 90 % of final value within 1 µs of a step input.

Watch for: Some datasheets specify response time as the time to reach 50 % of final value. That's not enough for desat — desat detectors typically trigger at 70-90 % of trip threshold.

SiC is even less forgiving

SiC MOSFETs have much shorter SCWT — typically 2-3 µs at full voltage. The same fault detection chain has to fit into less than half the IGBT budget.

For SiC, your sensor needs:

  • Response time < 500 ns to 90 %
  • Bandwidth ≥ 200 kHz to avoid phase lag
  • Low-noise output to allow tight comparator threshold

Sensor placement matters

Even with a fast sensor, parasitic inductance in the bus bar and cabling can slow current rise as seen by the sensor. Two best practices:

  1. Place the sensor in the bus bar carrying short-circuit current — not in the inverter output cable, where current is bandwidth-limited by load inductance.
  2. Minimize stray inductance between sensor and gate driver — locate the comparator on the gate driver board, not the control board.

A sensor with a 500 ns response delay can become a 2 µs effective delay if it sits 30 cm away from the gate driver.

Three failure modes I see in field

Failure 1: Sensor too slow

SCWT exceeded before turn-off completes. IGBT fails open-circuit, often taking adjacent devices with it.

Failure 2: False trip on switching transients

Sensor bandwidth is too high for the noise environment — every commutation triggers a trip. Customer disables desat. Next real fault destroys the module.

Failure 3: Compensation winding ringing

Closed-loop sensor's secondary winding rings on fast di/dt events. Output overshoots, comparator trips. Ironically caused by too sensitive a sensor.

The fix in all three cases: pick a sensor with specified response time AND bandwidth AND noise, not just one of them.

Specification template for desat-protected drives

ParameterIGBT specSiC spec
Response time (10-90 %)≤ 1 µs≤ 500 ns
Bandwidth (-3 dB)≥ 100 kHz≥ 200 kHz
Output noise (RMS)≤ 1 % of nominal≤ 0.5 %
dV/dt immunity≥ 25 kV/µs≥ 50 kV/µs
Overload (3 µs pulse)≥ 10× nominal≥ 10× nominal

Quick checklist

  1. ✅ Datasheet specifies response time to 90 % (not 50 %)
  2. ✅ Bandwidth and response time both specified
  3. ✅ Sensor placed close to the gate driver
  4. ✅ dV/dt rating exceeds your bus + commutation rate
  5. ✅ Lab-tested with actual short-circuit at full bus voltage

Looking at sensors for this application?

Browse recommended products →

Frequently Asked Questions

Ready to Find the Right Sensor?

Browse our complete range of precision Hall Effect sensors.

Browse Products