The fundamental difference
Both topologies use a Hall Effect element to sense the magnetic field generated by the primary current — that is where the similarity ends.
Open-loop sensors output a voltage proportional to the Hall element output. Simple, low cost, low quiescent current. Accuracy depends entirely on the Hall element's linearity and offset.
Closed-loop sensors use the Hall element only as an error detector. A secondary winding drives a counter-current that exactly cancels the primary's magnetic flux at the core. Output is the secondary current, which is a precise scaled replica of the primary current.
Open-loop = "measure the field" Closed-loop = "null the field, measure the nulling current"
Side-by-side comparison
| Parameter | Open-loop | Closed-loop |
|---|---|---|
| Typical accuracy | ±1 to ±2 % | ±0.2 to ±0.5 % |
| Bandwidth | 25-100 kHz | 100-200 kHz |
| Phase shift @ 50 Hz | <0.5° | <0.2° |
| Linearity | Limited by core saturation | Excellent (no core saturation) |
| Long-term offset drift | Higher | Very low |
| Supply current | 10-15 mA | 30-50 mA + secondary current |
| Cost | Lower | Higher (typically 1.5-2×) |
| Output type | Voltage | Voltage or current (4-20 mA) |
When to use open-loop
Pick open-loop when:
- Accuracy budget is loose (>1 % overall)
- Power budget matters — battery-operated, low-power IoT applications
- Cost is the dominant constraint — high-volume consumer drives
- The current you measure is bidirectional but small (<100 A)
Typical applications:
- Consumer-grade VFDs
- Low-power UPS (≤ 5 kVA)
- Solar string monitoring
When to use closed-loop
Pick closed-loop when:
- Accuracy must beat 1 % — revenue metering, precision motor control
- Bandwidth ≥ 100 kHz needed — servo drives, fast SiC inverters
- Long-term drift matters — solar farms, traction systems with 25-year service
- Galvanic isolation budget is tight — need reinforced insulation in compact form factor
Typical applications:
- Railway traction inverters
- High-end servo drives
- DC fast chargers
- Utility-scale solar inverters
Three real-world spec examples
Example 1: 7.4 kW EV on-board charger (cost-driven)
- Primary current: 32 A (AC input)
- Required accuracy: 1 %
- Bandwidth needed: 100 kHz
- → Open-loop is sufficient. ~30 % cost reduction vs closed-loop.
Example 2: Locomotive auxiliary inverter (reliability-driven)
- Primary current: 200 A
- Required accuracy: 0.5 % over -40 to +85°C
- Service life: 30 years
- → Closed-loop is mandatory. Drift and accuracy across temperature can't be met by open-loop.
Example 3: 100 kW solar inverter (efficiency-driven)
- Primary current: 250 A
- Required accuracy: 0.5 %
- Bandwidth: 150 kHz for anti-islanding
- → Closed-loop. The 0.3 % drift difference compounds to thousands of kWh over a 25-year farm.
The hidden cost of getting it wrong
Specifying open-loop where closed-loop is needed often shows up as:
- Drift in calibration within 6-12 months of field deployment
- Phase errors that destabilize current control loops
- Failed accuracy at extreme temperatures during type testing
These issues are expensive to fix in the field — usually requiring full sensor swap-out across an installed base.
Quick decision matrix
| Need accuracy <1 %? | Need BW >100 kHz? | Service life >10 years? | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | Yes | Yes | Closed-loop |
| Yes | No | Yes | Closed-loop |
| No | No | <5 yr | Open-loop |
| No | Yes | Any | Closed-loop |
